Home
 Moto Info
 Road cycling is dangerous,  unhealthy
and not environmentally friendly > 
 

This page has grown a lot and reading everything takes a lot of time. If you are a cyclist and you already think that all this is nonsense, please read sections on health, dangers related to road cycling and highway code. And perhaps on road incompatibility of bicycles new!!!. Reading them may change the way you cycle and save some problems in the future. If you are brave enough please read everything.
The correspondence  - I don't update it - sorry. Up to now I have received 100+ letters and I would like to include some of the comments, make a few (minor) corrections and add some other views of various problems. Thank you for all the letters on cycling in US and Australia.
FAQ new!!!- please read it before e-mailing me
The history of this page
Automated (i.e. you may not recognize your language) German and French translations of this page by Google.
Are you sure that you want lower fuel prices in Britain ???

People can be divided into 2 categories. The one who praise cycling and the one who keep quiet about it.
I belong to the third category - who criticizes everything praised.

"Cycling is safer than walking", yes ... but who said that walking is safe ...

Road Cycling is Dangerous, Unhealthy
and not Environmentally Friendly (v.0.6.1)
by Arek Zawada


Do you remember 50's, 60's streets full of poisonous gases generated by big, heavy and noisy cars. A few miles further there were factories making these cars, steel for them or petrol. Many people in London suffered a large variety of dangerous illnesses. Do you remember? I don't but I saw it on TV. Not surprisingly nobody liked that and many fought against that. Fortunately, very successfully!
So now forgot about it! This is the past.

Today, if you buy a car its emissions are many orders of magnitude smaller, than the one from 50s. The most likely it will emit much less than the current allowed levels, which go down every year. If you look into the near future still there is a lot which can be done and is going to be done. Also there are works in the area of city vehicles, which are optimized for city cycle, that is, for example, frequent accelerations or long waiting in traffic jams.
Buses improved a lot too. They look prettier, they are much less noisy, they use less fuel and are more pleasant for their passengers. A disabled person can usually access it very easily.
Finally fuels have improved a lot. Leaded petrol is no longer used and diesel fuel has much less contamination, such as sulphur. Also all new cars and buses use multi stage catalysers which significantly reduces the level of unwanted emissions.

But ... still the average British car is 7.7 year old. A bus probably more than that. Many can hardly stay within the emission limits ...

How about bikes. A bit this, a bit that. Perhaps look a bit fancier but nothing really changed. 50 years ago cars needed attention every hundred km or less and bikes roughly the same. Today, an average car is likely to work fine for 60 000km or so without any trouble, just with recommended servicing. Today's bike needs attention every 500-1000km, that is only about 5 times more than its older brother from 50's. There are some kinds of bike "mutants" such as recumbents. They are much more expensive (usually 5+ times) but can give much greater protection to the cyclist in case of an accident. However ... not popular at all. The high cost and much lower "portability" (more difficult to transport by car or bus) can be blamed for their low popularity.

As you can see bicycles are being developed at much lower pace than cars. Obviously, there will be one day when cars "overtake" bikes in all the fields.

Why ? It is impossible! Bikes are green! No, as long as they do not grow on trees. At the moment during the production of one bike about 130kg of CO2 from non-renewable sources is being released. Not a lot but that bike is also used not a lot or at least much less than a bus or a car. Obviously many other gases are emitted too.

But when this may happen? In my opinion we will not have to wait too long. Already in a few areas bicycles are well behind cars and buses.
 

OK, now please click on the following links to see the full details:

I. Cycling is dangerous

and because of all these: II. Cycling is unhealthy III. Cycling is not that environmentally friendly IV. Cycling is inefficient and Road Incompatibility of Bicyclesnew!!! V. Miscellaneous


A. Road cycling and the Highway Code

B. Data sources and Related links


Final conclusions:

1. Conventional bicycles are simple, cheap, dangerous and inefficiently used man powered vehicles - cyclists tend to compare bicycles with cars or buses on one to one basis, what gives a very false image. Also fabrication emissions are usually ignored.

2. Road cycling is very dangerous, significantly more than using public transport or driving a car. On pavements cyclists are more dangerous to the others than the other to cyclists.

3. Bicycles offer only 2-3 times lower the overall emissions than cars or buses. Cyclists usually ignore the fact that somewhere in Asia there are acid rains caused by plants (steel, power,...), which have produced their bikes. However, after adjusting the emission values due to road incompatibility of bicycles, overall emissions of cars are lower than bicycles.

4. Cycle lanes are over 5 times less efficient, in terms of passenger flow, than bus lanes.

5. Cyclists are the road users the most exposed to exhaust gases, therefore cycling is potentially dangerous for the cyclists' health. In contrast to that, new buses have most of the time fume free air inside. Vibrations generated whilst riding a bicycle are proved to be dangerous for the cyclist's health.

6. Converting parts of heavily used city roads into cycle lanes is simply promoting a very unhealthy and dangerous way of travelling.

7. Cycling is not for everybody - only a small portion of population potentially can cycle on a road safely.

and some eco-nonsenses:

8. In the UK, during the rush hours, taxis, polluting 2 times more than average cars and much more than buses, are privileged to use the bus lanes.

9. In the UK the government is going to impose a carbon tax on the new cars only, that is the cars which are MUCH, MUCH more environmentally friendly that the one already on the roads. I suppose this is to encourage people to use more the old and smoky ones.


Acknowledgements

I would like to say thank you to the the people who spent their time analysing my calculations and also for many constructive criticisms. However, due to the very controversial nature of that page I will mention their names only after their agreements.

E.B. (cyclist commuter) - many useful information on cycling, driving and public transport in US, or cycling in general (Arizona, US)
G.W. (cyclist commuter) - also some bike exploitation data in heely Sheffield
Istvan Bogdan (cyclist commuter) - some bike exploitation data in heely Sheffield
Y.I.Z (ex-cyclist-commuter)- for some exploitation data from Beijing, China (I was really surprised to hear how road cycling is organized there)
.... (I should add more!)


Last word (today)

My page will always be anti road cycling. This is the main aim of it. But it does not mean that I want road cycling to be banned or anything like that. No! Many people DO LIKE cycling, many people rely of road cycling as the the way of commuting or everyday source of physical exercise. This makes them fitter, healthier and also feel better. Many simply, just for pleasure, make a cycling break from everyday life. I see no reason why all these people should be forbidden doing what they like!

But ...

I see not reason why people should be forced to do that !

Also if you want to promote road cycling - no problem but don't claim that it is safe, healthy and environmentally friendly because IT OFTEN IS NOT and in the next few years it will get even worse. Even in the Netherlands, the cycling perfection, cycling is not safe.
Unfortunately cyclists cause serious (per km travelled) but distributed environmental damage. UK cyclists should use about 8mln tyres a year. Are they on one pile ? No, they are spread across the whole Britain. Cyclists should use about 5mln of AA batteries a year. Where do they go ?

I claim that cycling can be made safer but the only efficient way is by making the cyclists EQUAL ROAD USERS to cars or buses. At the moment they are equal only to cows and sheep, which do not have to know the highway code and they also use both roads and pavements (and no lights) but ARE environmentally friendly.

A person, who taught himself how to drive a car off-road and now drives very well (off-road) but do not know the road driving code, starts using public roads. Do you think this is a good idea ? Will he be a safe driver ? But this is what happens in case of many cyclists. 

I think that the fact that cyclists do not kill so many people as cars is not sufficient explanation why they should use public roads without any prior preparations. 

You are allowed to disagree.

---

Unfortunately, nowadays in England many HEAVILY used roads are now being "upgraded" with cycle lanes, what I believe is the cheapest solution to make the cycling activists happy(*). In many cases cycle lanes can be build in parallel to major road, on minor roads but this is much more expensive. At the same time the cycling fans are praising how healthy and safe it is to cycle to work.
And this is why I decided to be in opposition.

(*)A few quotations from John Forester's page: 
"Government knows that bikeways don't make cycling safer, but it uses the public superstition that they do"
"The government's bicycle design standard is based on engineering incompetence"
"Bikeways neither make cycling much safer nor reduce the skill required. They probably do the reverse"
"Government bike planners mix cyclists with pedestrians"

Your Opinion about this Page
Please choose one:

Total nonsense
I don't agree with anything
You might be right
What is it for ?
Do you speak English?
True, but show some solutions!
Whatever you say I like cycling.

 


Current Results


Arek Zawada, arek@yes-but.net
28.9.2000  (19/8/2001)
Visitors since 17/10/03: